Back to first review SIFT review

See the shape of a completed review.

This illustrative example shows how BidSift organizes a job before you spend time pricing it.

Illustrative example Commercial interiors

Northline office refresh

Tacoma, WA · Bid due May 14 at 2:00 PM PT · Northline Construction
MAYBE
Recommendation

Ask for the finish schedule and access details before committing to a bid. The trade and company-fit notes appear workable, but the submitted scope leaves finish responsibility and after-hours access unresolved.

Recommended next action

Close the information gaps

Get the finish schedule and access requirements, then decide whether the opportunity is ready for the next estimating step.

Scope · Scope summary

Interior refresh across occupied office areas with selective demolition, new finishes, and a requested June mobilization window.

Information gaps · Open questions
  • Which finish schedule governs the work?
  • Who carries after-hours building access and protection requirements?
Information gaps · Missing information
  • Confirmed finish responsibilities and allowance detail.
  • Site access, phasing, and occupied-area coordination requirements.
Fit · Fit signals
  • Commercial interiors are within the stated preferred work.
  • The requested mobilization window appears possible based on the submitted notes.
Tradeoffs · Tradeoffs
  • Broad allowance language could add scope questions during pricing.
  • An occupied site and tight start window may increase coordination effort.
Review a job See the checklist

Illustrative example only. This is not an estimate, guarantee, or profit prediction. BidSift uses the information submitted for a specific opportunity and does not independently verify it.